Archive for February, 2011

Ebola glycoprotein accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum

Friday, February 11th, 2011

Ebola virus Ebola glycoprotein (GP) is the only virus protein expressed on the surface of Ebola virus and mediates entry into target cells. However, several studies report that GP expression also causes cytotoxicity, although the underlying mechanism remains unknown. GP is also believed to be a key determinant of Ebola pathogenesis and virus-like particles (VLPs) containing GP are shown to activate human endothelial cells and macrophages. The other virus proteins tested were not cytotoxic. Collectively, these reports indicate that Ebola GP imparts cell rounding and cytotoxicity in addition to facilitating virus entry. As full-length GP but not the secreted form (sGP) is shown to cause cytotoxicity, this suggests that the release of sGP during Ebola virus infection could be a mechanism used by the virus to prevent cytotoxicity and replicate and spread throughout the body.

Ebola glycoprotein accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum. Virology Journal 2011, 8:11 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-11
The Filoviridae family comprises of Ebola and Marburg viruses, which are known to cause lethal hemorrhagic fever. However, there is no effective anti-viral therapy or licensed vaccines currently available for these human pathogens. The envelope glycoprotein (GP) of Ebola virus, which mediates entry into target cells, is cytotoxic and this effect maps to a highly glycosylated mucin-like region in the surface subunit of GP (GP1). However, the mechanism underlying this cytotoxic property of GP is unknown. To gain insight into the basis of this GP-induced cytotoxicity, HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with full-length and mucin-deleted (Δmucin) Ebola GP plasmids and GP localization was examined relative to the nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi, early and late endosomes using deconvolution fluorescent microscopy. Full-length Ebola GP was observed to accumulate in the ER. In contrast, GPΔmucin was uniformly expressed throughout the cell and did not localize in the ER. The Ebola major matrix protein VP40 was also co-expressed with GP to investigate its influence on GP localization. GP and VP40 co- expression did not alter GP localization to the ER. Also, when VP40 was co-expressed with the nucleoprotein (NP), it localized to the plasma membrane while NP accumulated in distinct cytoplasmic structures lined with vimentin. These latter structures are consistent with aggresomes and may serve as assembly sites for filoviral nucleocapsids. Collectively, these data suggest that full-length GP, but not GPΔmucin, accumulates in the ER in close proximity to the nuclear membrane, which may underscore its cytotoxic property.

Related:

Assortment and packaging of the rotavirus genome

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

Rotavirus The rotavirus (RV) genome comprises 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and is contained within a non-enveloped, icosahedral particle. During assembly, a highly coordinated selective packaging mechanism ensures that progeny RV virions contain one of each genome segment. Cis-acting signals thought to mediate assortment and packaging are associated with putative panhandle structures formed by base-pairing of the ends of RV plus-strand RNAs (+RNAs). Viral polymerases within assembling core particles convert the 11 distinct +RNAs to dsRNA genome segments. It remains unclear whether RV +RNAs are assorted before or during encapsidation, and the functions of viral proteins during these processes are not resolved. However, as reviewed in this article, recent insights gained from the study of RV and two other segmented RNA viruses, influenza A virus and bacteriophage Φ6, reveal potential mechanisms of RV assortment and packaging.

Assortment and packaging of the segmented rotavirus genome. Trends Microbiol. Dec 30 2010

Related:

Increasing evidence that enteroviruses are “linked to” (not “cause of”) type 1 diabetes

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

Children with type 1 diabetes are nearly 10 times as likely to have a particular viral infection than children without diabetes. This news is based on a high-quality review of the findings of 26 studies that assessed how common an enterovirus infection is among people with and without type 1 diabetes. The enterovirus group of viruses includes polio and coxsackie viruses, which are believed to be the viruses most likely linked to type 1 diabetes. The review findings indicate a clear relationship, with the odds of having an enterovirus infection in people with type 1 diabetes almost 10 times greater than in unaffected individuals. However, as the researchers importantly note, the review cannot prove that the virus causes diabetes as the studies cannot confirm that infection occurred before the onset of diabetes. This research supports previous studies that have identified enteroviruses as being linked to type 1 diabetes. There is now a need to assess the relationship between the virus and diabetes over time to determine whether there really is a cause-and-effect relationship between the two.
Source: NHS Choices

Original paper:
Enterovirus infection and type 1 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational molecular studies. BMJ 2011; 2011; 342:d35

Related:

Avipoxviruses – biology and use as vaccine vectors

Monday, February 7th, 2011

Fowlpox virus Avipoxviruses (APVs) are distributed worldwide and cause disease in domestic, pet and wild birds of many species. APVs are transmitted by aerosols and biting insects, particularly mosquitoes and arthropods and are usually named after the bird species from which they were originally isolated. The virus species Fowlpox virus (FWPV) causes disease in poultry and associated mortality is usually low, but in flocks under stress (other diseases, high production) mortality can reach up to 50%. APVs are also major players in viral vaccine vector development for diseases in human and veterinary medicine. Abortive infection in mammalian cells (no production of progeny viruses) and their ability to accommodate multiple gene inserts are some of the characteristics that make APVs promising vaccine vectors. Although abortive infection in mammalian cells conceivably represents a major vaccine bio-safety advantage, molecular mechanisms restricting APVs to certain hosts are not yet fully understood. This review summarizes the current knowledge relating to APVs, including classification, morphogenesis, host-virus interactions, diagnostics and disease, and also highlights the use of APVs as recombinant vaccine vectors.

Avipoxviruses: infection biology and their use as vaccine vectors. Virology Journal 2011, 8:49 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-49

Related:

Cidofovir Activity against Poxvirus Infections

Friday, February 4th, 2011

Cidofovir Cidofovir is an acyclic nucleoside analog approved since 1996 for clinical use in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in AIDS patients. Cidofovir (CDV) has broad-spectrum activity against DNA viruses, including herpes-, adeno-, polyoma-, papilloma- and poxviruses. Among poxviruses, cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against orthopox [vaccinia, variola (smallpox), cowpox, monkeypox, camelpox, ectromelia], molluscipox [molluscum contagiosum] and parapox [orf] viruses. The anti-poxvirus activity of cidofovir in vivo has been shown in different models of infection when the compound was administered either intraperitoneal, intranasal (aerosolized) or topically. In humans, cidofovir has been successfully used for the treatment of recalcitrant molluscum contagiosum virus and orf virus in immunocompromised patients. CDV remains a reference compound against poxviruses and holds potential for the therapy and short-term prophylaxis of not only orthopox- but also parapox- and molluscipoxvirus infections.

Cidofovir Activity against Poxvirus Infections. (2010) Viruses 2(12): 2803-2830 doi:10.3390/v2122803

Related:

There’s a draft in here

Thursday, February 3rd, 2011

Draft figures for the new edition of Principles of Molecular Virology!

Does your gut rule your head?

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

This is a mouse

A new research paper shows that mice bred in sterile environments without a normal gut flora behave differently to mice which develped with with normal bacteria in their gut. The germ-free mice were more adventurous and less anxious than normal mice.

How the bacteria cause these changes in development and behaviour remains a mystery, but this research adds furter weight to the idea that gut bacteria are a critical part of the overall development of mammals.

Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. PNAS USA 31 January 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.10105291
Microbial colonization of mammals is an evolution-driven process that modulate host physiology, many of which are associated with immunity and nutrient intake. Here, we report that colonization by gut microbiota impacts mammalian brain development and subsequent adult behavior. Using measures of motor activity and anxiety-like behavior, we demonstrate that germ free (GF) mice display increased motor activity and reduced anxiety, compared with specific pathogen free (SPF) mice with a normal gut microbiota. This behavioral phenotype is associated with altered expression of genes known to be involved in second messenger pathways and synaptic long-term potentiation in brain regions implicated in motor control and anxiety-like behavior. GF mice exposed to gut microbiota early in life display similar characteristics as SPF mice, including reduced expression of PSD-95 and synaptophysin in the striatum. Hence, our results suggest that the microbial colonization process initiates signaling mechanisms that affect neuronal circuits involved in motor control and anxiety behavior.

Related:

Archaea – timeline of the third domain

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

Three domains The Archaea evolved as one of the three primary lineages several billion years ago, but the first archaea to be discovered were described in the scientific literature about 130 years ago. Moreover, the Archaea were formally proposed as the third domain of life only 20 years ago. Over this very short period of investigative history, the scientific community has learned many remarkable things about the Archaea – their unique cellular components and pathways, their abundance and critical function in diverse natural environments, and their quintessential role in shaping the evolutionary path of life on Earth. This review charts the ‘archaea movement’, from its genesis through to key findings that, when viewed together, illustrate just how strongly the field has built on new knowledge to advance our understanding not only of the Archaea, but of biology as a whole.

Archaea — timeline of the third domain. (2011) Nature Reviews Microbiology 9: 51-61 doi:10.1038/nrmicro2482

Related: