Posts Tagged ‘mimivirus’

Move over Mimivirus, there’s a new Megavirus in town

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

I make no secret of my admiration for Mimivirus, the largest virus known. I make quite a play of what Mimivirus tells us about the nature of viruses and virus evolution in the new edition of Principles of Molecular Virology:

Principles of Molecular Virology
Click for more information

But of course, as soon as you publish a printed textbook, it’s out of date (that’s why I write this blog). And so it proved this week when Mimivirus was knocked off it’s throne by the latest Girus to come along – the even bigger OMGItsSoHugeItBlocksOutTheSun virus. Well, actually, they called it Megavirus (but you get the general idea). With a genome of 1.26 million base pairs of DNA (megabases), this is now the largest virus known (until we discover an even bigger one).

So what do these monsters tell us about viruses? Probably quite a lot, as this excellent Wired article describes.

See:
Distant Mimivirus relative with a larger genome highlights the fundamental features of Megaviridae. PNAS USA 10 Oct 2011. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1110889108
Mimivirus, a DNA virus infecting acanthamoeba, was for a long time the largest known virus both in terms of particle size and gene content. Its genome encodes 979 proteins, including the first four aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (ArgRS, CysRS, MetRS, and TyrRS) ever found outside of cellular organisms. The discovery that Mimivirus encoded trademark cellular functions prompted a wealth of theoretical studies revisiting the concept of virus and associated large DNA viruses with the emergence of early eukaryotes. However, the evolutionary significance of these unique features remained impossible to assess in absence of a Mimivirus relative exhibiting a suitable evolutionary divergence. Here, we present Megavirus chilensis, a giant virus isolated off the coast of Chile, but capable of replicating in fresh water acanthamoeba. Its 1,259,197-bp genome is the largest viral genome fully sequenced so far. It encodes 1,120 putative proteins, of which 258 (23%) have no Mimivirus homologs. The 594 Megavirus/Mimivirus orthologs share an average of 50% of identical residues. Despite this divergence, Megavirus retained all of the genomic features characteristic of Mimivirus, including its cellular-like genes. Moreover, Megavirus exhibits three additional aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes (IleRS, TrpRS, and AsnRS) adding strong support to the previous suggestion that the Mimivirus/Megavirus lineage evolved from an ancestral cellular genome by reductive evolution. The main differences in gene content between Mimivirus and Megavirus genomes are due to (i) lineages specific gains or losses of genes, (ii) lineage specific gene family expansion or deletion, and (iii) the insertion/migration of mobile elements (intron, intein).

 

Giruses not a new domain?

Friday, July 1st, 2011

The tree Resolving the “tree of life” is among the most interesting and challenging questions in evolutionary biology. Although it is widely held that the Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya form three distinct domains of life, two competing hypotheses place the Eukaryotes either as a sister taxon to the Archaea – the so-called 3 domains tree. The small genomes of viruses did not contain enough information to reliably position them on the tree of life. This was changed by the discovery of Mimivirus, a nucleocytoplasmic large DNA virus (NCLDV) with a genome of unprecedented size (1.2 Mb) and coding capacity (1,000 ORFs), exceeding that of many cellular organisms. In an initial phylogenetic analysis, Mimivirus emerged from the branch joining Archaea and Eukaryotes, suggesting that it might represent a distinct fourth domain of life. New analysis suggests that the informational genes of NCLDV (RNAP2, PCNA, FEN and TFIIB) have been acquired by horizontal transfer from donors within the eukaryotic domain, and suggests that invoking an ancient “4th domain” for NCLDV, or a special primordial role for NCLDV in the formation of Eukaryotes, are not needed to explain the available molecular sequence data for this group of viruses.

Informational Gene Phylogenies Do Not Support a Fourth Domain of Life for Nucleocytoplasmic Large DNA Viruses. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21080. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021080
Mimivirus is a nucleocytoplasmic large DNA virus (NCLDV) with a genome size (1.2 Mb) and coding capacity ( 1000 genes) comparable to that of some cellular organisms. Unlike other viruses, Mimivirus and its NCLDV relatives encode homologs of broadly conserved informational genes found in Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes, raising the possibility that they could be placed on the tree of life. A recent phylogenetic analysis of these genes showed the NCLDVs emerging as a monophyletic group branching between Eukaryotes and Archaea. These trees were interpreted as evidence for an independent “fourth domain” of life that may have contributed DNA processing genes to the ancestral eukaryote. However, the analysis of ancient evolutionary events is challenging, and tree reconstruction is susceptible to bias resulting from non-phylogenetic signals in the data. These include compositional heterogeneity and homoplasy, which can lead to the spurious grouping of compositionally-similar or fast-evolving sequences. Here, we show that these informational gene alignments contain both significant compositional heterogeneity and homoplasy, which were not adequately modelled in the original analysis. When we use more realistic evolutionary models that better fit the data, the resulting trees are unable to reject a simple null hypothesis in which these informational genes, like many other NCLDV genes, were acquired by horizontal transfer from eukaryotic hosts. Our results suggest that a fourth domain is not required to explain the available sequence data.

Closely related to this comes the news that in the absence of competition with other microorganisms, Mimivirus, the largest known DNA virus, loses 17% of its genome. In a natural environment Mimiviruses live in a “community.” They share their amoebal hosts with other organisms such as viruses and bacteria. Constant exchanges of genes within these organisms with intra-amoebal life, not just between each other but also with their protozoan host, have allowed this evolution towards a “community” life. Researchers cultivated Mimivirus in the laboratory, alone in an amoeba without contact with other organisms. After only 150 passages, they observed a 17% reduction in the size of its genome. This genomic loss mainly occurs in the form of deletions of both ends of the genome. In the absence of other microorganisms and thus competition within the host, the Mimivirus eliminates part of its genome by deleting in particular the genes involved in the formation of the long fibers that surround its capsid, becoming “bald.” The researchers also found that this deleted form became resistant to virophages.

 

Mimivirus shows dramatic genome reduction after intraamoebal culture. (2011) PNAS USA 108(25): 10296-10301 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101118108
Most phagocytic protist viruses have large particles and genomes as well as many laterally acquired genes that may be associated with a sympatric intracellular life (a community-associated lifestyle with viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotes) and the presence of virophages. By subculturing Mimivirus 150 times in a germ-free amoebal host, we observed the emergence of a bald form of the virus that lacked surface fibers and replicated in a morphologically different type of viral factory. When studying a 0.40-μm filtered cloned particle, we found that its genome size shifted from 1.2 (M1) to 0.993 Mb (M4), mainly due to large deletions occurring at both ends of the genome. Some of the lost genes are encoding enzymes required for posttranslational modification of the structural viral proteins, such as glycosyltransferases and ankyrin repeat proteins. Proteomic analysis allowed identification of three proteins, probably required for the assembly of virus fibers. The genes for two of these were found to be deleted from the M4 virus genome. The proteins associated with fibers are highly antigenic and can be recognized by mouse and human antimimivirus antibodies. In addition, the bald strain (M4) was not able to propagate the sputnik virophage. Overall, the Mimivirus transition from a sympatric to an allopatric lifestyle was associated with a stepwise genome reduction and the production of a predominantly bald virophage resistant strain. The new axenic ecosystem allowed the allopatric Mimivirus to lose unnecessary genes that might be involved in the control of competitors.

Breaking the 1000-gene barrier for Mimivirus

Monday, March 14th, 2011

Mimivirus Mimivirus, a nucleocytoplasmic large double stranded DNA virus infecting Acanthamoeba species, is the largest virus identified to date. Its icosahedral fibrillated capsid has a diameter of 750 nm. Besides its outstanding particle size, the genome of Mimivirus is also exceptional both in size and complexity. The initial sequencing revealed a linear genome of 1,181,404 nt (roughly the size of the spirochaete bacterium Treponema pallidum genome) harboring 911 protein coding genes and 6 tRNAs. Some of these genes were observed for the first time in a virus, the most salient being those involved in protein translation and DNA repair. These unique features reawaked conceptual discussions on the nature of viruses and the frontier between viruses and cellular organisms.

Breaking the 1000-gene barrier for Mimivirus using ultra-deep genome and transcriptome sequencing. (2011) Virology Journal 2011, 8:99 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-99
Background: Mimivirus, a giant dsDNA virus infecting Acanthamoeba, is the prototype of the mimiviridae family, the latest addition to the family of the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs). Its 1.2 Mb-genome was initially predicted to encode 917 genes. A subsequent RNA-Seq analysis precisely mapped many transcript boundaries and identified 75 new genes.FindingsWe now report a much deeper analysis using the SOLiD technology combining RNA-Seq of the Mimivirus transcriptome during the infectious cycle (202.4 Million reads), and a complete genome re-sequencing (45.3 Million reads). This study corrected the genome sequence and identified several single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our results also provided clear evidence of previously overlooked transcription units, including an important RNA polymerase subunit distantly related to Euryarchea homologues. The total Mimivirus gene count is now 1018, 11% greater than the original annotation. Conclusions: This study highlights the huge progress brought about by ultra-deep sequencing for the comprehensive annotation of virus genomes, opening the door to a complete one-nucleotide resolution level description of their transcriptional activity, and to the realistic modeling of the viral genome expression at the ultimate molecular level. This work also illustrates the need to go beyond bioinformatics-only approaches for the annotation of short protein and non-coding genes in viral genomes.

Related:

Another Really, Really Big Virus

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

Mimivirus Typically, viruses are considered to be small particles that easily pass through 0.2 µm filters and have small genomes containing a few protein-encoding genes. However, large viruses with huge dsDNA genomes that encode hundreds of proteins are being discovered with increasing frequency. These large viruses have also been referred to as giruses in order to emphasize their unique properties. Examples of giruses include:

  1. Mimivirus and its close relative Mamavirus, which infect amoebae and have the largest genomes (~1.2 Mb). Mimivirus has 979 protein-encoding sequences (CDSs), six tRNA genes and 33 non-coding RNA genes.
  2. Viruses that infect algae (phycodnaviruses) and have genomes up to ~560 kb.
  3. Viruses, such as bacterophage G, that infect bacteria and have genomes up to ~670 kb (~498 kb is unique sequence).

A recent report describes the newest girus, a lytic virus (named CroV) that infects the marine microzooplankton Cafeteria roenbergensis. CroV has a ~730 kb genome and contains 544 CDSs and 22 tRNAs encoding genes in the 618 kb central region of its genome. Viruses with genomes ranging from 100 to 280 kb, such as herpesviruses and baculoviruses, are not discussed in this commentary, and poxviruses, asfarviruses, iridoviruses, and ascoviruses are only briefly mentioned because of their evolutionary connection to some giruses. Another group of viruses with dsDNA genomes >500 kb are the polydnaviruses.

To place the size of these large viruses into perspective, the smallest free-living bacterium, Mycoplasma genitalium, encodes ~470 CDSs. Although estimates of the minimum genome size required to support life are ~250 CDSs, some symbiotic bacteria such as Carsonella ruddii and Hodgkinia cicadicola have genomes of 160 kb and 144 kb, respectively. Thus, many large viruses have more CDSs than some single-celled organisms.

Another Really, Really Big Virus. (2011) Viruses 3(1): 32-46; doi:10.3390/v3010032
Viruses with genomes larger than 300 kb and up to 1.2 Mb, which encode hundreds of proteins, are being discovered and characterized with increasing frequency. Most, but not all, of these large viruses (often referred to as giruses) infect protists that live in aqueous environments. Bioinformatic analyses of metagenomes of aqueous samples indicate that large DNA viruses are quite common in nature and await discovery. One issue that is perhaps not appreciated by the virology community is that large viruses, even those classified in the same family, can differ significantly in morphology, lifestyle, and gene complement. This brief commentary, which will mention some of these unique properties, was stimulated by the characterization of the newest member of this club, virus CroV (Fischer, M.G.; Allen, M.J.; Wilson, W.H.; Suttle, C.A. Giant virus with a remarkable complement of genes infects marine zooplankton. PNAS USA 2010, 107, 19508-19513). CroV has a 730 kb genome (with ~544 protein-encoding genes) and infects the marine microzooplankton Cafeteria roenbergensis producing a lytic infection.

Related:

DNA Viruses – Really Big Ones

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Mimivirus Viruses with genomes greater than 300 kb and up to 1200 kb are being discovered with increasing frequency. These large viruses (often called giruses) can encode up to 900 proteins and also many tRNAs. Consequently, these viruses have more protein-encoding genes than many bacteria, and the concept of small particle/small genome that once defined viruses is no longer valid. Giruses infect bacteria and animals although most of the recently discovered ones infect protists. Thus, genome gigantism is not restricted to a specific host or phylogenetic clade. To date, most of the giruses are associated with aqueous environments. Many of these large viruses (phycodnaviruses and Mimiviruses) probably have a common evolutionary ancestor with the poxviruses, iridoviruses, asfarviruses, ascoviruses, and a recently discovered Marseillevirus. One issue that is perhaps not appreciated by the microbiology community is that large viruses, even ones classified in the same family, can differ significantly in morphology, lifestyle, and genome structure. This review focuses on some of these differences rather than provides extensive details about individual viruses.

DNA Viruses: The Really Big Ones (Giruses). Annu Rev Microbiol. May 12 2010 | PDF

Related:

Giant microscope meets giant virus

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Mimivirus Mimivirus appears most closely related structurally to large algal viruses such as PBCV-1 and other irridoviruses, though it possesses additional features not present in those viruses. The icosahedral capsid consists of 20 large triangular plates joined at their edges to produce the required 12 fivefold vertices. The capsid surface is composed of trimeric major capsid proteins, each subunit of which consists of two jelly roll beta barrels, arranged in a very open hexagonal lattice, with the appearance of a honeycomb. The center-to-center distance of the capsomeres is 14 nm. Because there is some ambiguity as to what lies exactly on the fivefold vertex, there is an uncertainty in the triangulation number T, which could have any one of nine possibilities lying between 972 and 1200.

The fibres that coat particles are reported to have lengths of about 125 nm and are probably anchored to the major capsid proteins or perhaps to an integument layer of protein disposed immediately above the capsid. The most striking and unique feature of mimivirus is a prominent five armed, star-shaped apparatus that occupies one vertex of every virus. While somewhat obscured on the intact virus, it is prominently displayed on particles which lack the coating of fibers. This star shaped assembly, termed a “stargate,” opens up once the virus is inside the host cell to produce a wide opening. The DNA of the virus, which is enclosed inside a membrane sac, then emerges from the interior, fuses with a cellular membrane, and delivers its nucleic acid contents to the cell. Another remarkable is that the DNA does not enter the capsid through the stargate, but through a separate portal, and by a completely different mechanism, in the center of a distal icosahedral face, i.e. at a threefold axis.

Atomic force microscopy investigation of the giant mimivirus. Virology. 2010 404(1): 127-137
Mimivirus was investigated by atomic force microscopy in its native state following serial degradation by lysozyme and bromelain. The 750-nm diameter virus is coated with a forest of glycosylated protein fibers of lengths about 140 nm with diameters 1.4 nm. Fibers are capped with distinctive ellipsoidal protein heads of estimated Mr=25 kDa. The surface fibers are attached to the particle through a layer of protein covering the capsid, which is in turn composed of the major capsid protein (MCP). The latter is organized as an open network of hexagonal rings with central depressions separated by 14 nm. The virion exhibits an elaborate apparatus at a unique vertex, visible as a star shaped depression on native particles, but on defibered virions as five arms of 50 nm width and 250 nm length rising above the capsid by 20 nm. The apparatus is integrated into the capsid and not applied atop the icosahedral lattice. Prior to DNA release, the arms of the star disengage from the virion and it opens by folding back five adjacent triangular faces. A membrane sac containing the DNA emerges from the capsid in preparation for fusion with a membrane of the host cell. Also observed from disrupted virions were masses of distinctive fibers of diameter about 1 nm, and having a 7-nm periodicity. These are probably contained within the capsid along with the DNA bearing sac. The fibers were occasionally observed associated with toroidal protein clusters interpreted as processive enzymes modifying the fibers.

Related:

Mimivirus replicates in the cytoplasm

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Mimivirus Poxviruses are considered to be unique among DNA viruses because their infection cycle is carried out exclusively in the host cytoplasm. Such an infection strategy is of interest, because it necessitates generation of elaborate factories in which viral replication and assembly are promoted. By using imaging techniques, researchers showed that the infection cycle of the largest virus currently identified, the Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus, similarly occurs exclusively in the host cytoplasm. Newly synthesized mRNAs accumulate at discrete cytoplasmic sites that are distinct from the sites where virus replication occurs, and this is also observed in vaccinia infection. By revealing substantial physiologic similarity between poxviruses and Mimivirus and thus, implying that an entirely cytoplasmic viral replication might be more common than generally considered, these findings underscore the ability of DNA viruses to generate large and elaborate replication factories.

Vaccinia-like cytoplasmic replication of the giant Mimivirus. PNAS USA March 15 2010 doi: 10.1073/pnas.091273710

Related:

Marvellous mimivirus

Monday, February 19th, 2007

MimivirusMimivirus is one of the largest and most complex viruses known. The virus was first isolated in 1992 from amoebae growing in a water tower in Bradford. The virus was observed in a Gram stain and mistakenly thought to be a gram-positive bacterium. In 2003, a research group in France were the first to identify this micro-organism as a virus (La Scola, B. et al. 2003 A giant virus in amoebae. Science 299: 2033). The genus Mimivirus presently contains a single virus species, Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV).

Subscribe to podcasts (free):
[iTunes] Enhanced podcasts
[RSS] mp3 podcasts (audio only)
Download this podcast (free):
Enhanced version
mp3 version (audio only)

Both the particle size and the genome size of mimivirus is larger than that of some small bacteria. The 1.2 Mbp genome, which contains 911 protein coding genes, provides sufficient information to allow the virus to perform most (but not quite all) of the functions of living cells. The complexity and magnitude of the mimivirus genome, combined with the large size of the virus, calls into question some of the established divisions between viruses and single-celled organisms, as well as raising questions about their evolution (Suzan-Monti et al. 2006 Genomic and evolutionary aspects of Mimivirus. Virus Research 117: 145-155).

Genome size

Examination using cryo-electron microscopy has shown that the particle has a capsid with a diameter of 750 nm, including an array of 125 nm long closely packed fibres projecting out from the capsid surface. Based on a large number of open reading frames with collagen triple helix repeats in the viral genome, these fibers might consist of collagen. The dense, 200 thick base of these fibers might be formed by cross-linking. The capsid itself appeared to contain three layers of dense matter, probably representing two successive 4 nm thick lipid membranes inside a protein shell approximately 7 nm thick (Mimivirus and the emerging concept of giant virus. Claverie JM. et al. 2006 Virus Res. 117: 133-144). Similar double lipid membrane layers have been found in some poxviruses and in African swine fever virus (ASFV), another very large virus. Mimivirus particles also have a unique protruding vertex at one corner of the particle similar to that seen in tailed bacteriophages.

Mimivirus has many characteristics which put it at the boundary between living organisms and non-living entities. It is as large as several bacteria, such as Rickettsia conorii and Tropheryma whipplei, has a genome larger than a number of bacteria, and encodes some genetic products previously not known to be possessed by any virus. In particular, mimivirus contains genes coding for nucleotide and amino acid synthesis which even some small obligate intracellular bacteria lack. This means that unlike these bacteria, mimivirus is not dependent on the host cell genome for coding the metabolic pathways for these products. It does however, lack genes for ribosomal proteins, making mimivirus dependent on a host cell for protein synthesis and energy metabolism.

So, is mimivirus alive? Like all viruses, mimivirus particles do not reproduce by division, but are replicated by the self-assembly of preformed components. This differentiates it from cellular living organisms such as bacteria.

Patients with pneumonia have shown positive serological tests for mimivirus, and a laboratory technician working with the virus developed pneumonia and seroconverted. However, neither of these observations was definitive proof that mimivirus can cause disease, so experimental infections have been carried out in mice, which also developed pneumonia (Khan M. et al. Pneumonia in mice inoculated experimentally with Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus. Microb Pathog. Dec 2006).

We may be hearing a lot more about mimivirus as our knowledge of this unique virus grows.