Posts Tagged ‘paramyxoviruses’

The nucleocapsid protein of measles virus blocks host interferon response

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Measles virus Measles virus (MV) belongs to the genus Morbillivirus of the family Paramyxoviridae. A number of paramyxoviruses inhibit host interferon (IFN) signaling pathways in host immune systems by various mechanisms. Inhibition mechanisms have been described for many paramyxoviruses. Although there are inconsistencies among previous reports concerning MV, it appears that P/V/C proteins interfere with the pathways.

This study confirms the effects of MV P gene products of a wild MV strain on IFN pathways and examined that of other viral proteins on it. The authors found that N protein acts as an IFN-α/β and γ-antagonist as strong as P gene products. They investigated the mechanisms of MV-N inhibition, and revealed that MV-N blocks the nuclear import of activated STAT without preventing STAT and Jak activation or STAT degradation, and that the nuclear translocation of MV-N is important for the inhibition. The inhibitory effect of the N protein was observed as a common feature of other morbilliviruses. These results suggest that N protein of MV as well as P/V/C proteins is involved in the inhibition of host IFN signaling pathways.

 

The nucleocapsid protein of measles virus blocks host interferon response. Virology. 05 Jan 2012

Negative strand RNA viruses – the state of the art

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

Virus Research It was my priveledge to work with Brian Mahy many years ago. Brian has just retired as long-serving Editor of Virus Research, and his swansong is an excellent special issue on negative strand RNA viruses – an important read for all virologists and an even more impirtant one for all aspiring virologists.

Virus Research: Negative Strand RNA Viruses Special Issue

  • Insights on influenza pathogenesis from the grave
  • Taming influenza viruses
  • Induction and evasion of type I interferon responses by influenza viruses
  • Immune responses to influenza virus infection
  • Novel vaccines against influenza viruses
  • Prospects for controlling future pandemics of influenza
  • New concepts in measles virus replication: Getting in and out in vivo and modulating the host cell environment
  • Recombinant vaccines against the mononegaviruses—What we have learned from animal disease controls
  • Biological feasibility of measles eradication
  • Progress in understanding and controlling respiratory syncytial virus: Still crazy after all these years
  • An unconventional pathway of mRNA cap formation by vesiculoviruses
  • Rhabdovirus accessory genes
  • Structural insights into the rhabdovirus transcription/replication complex
  • Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome
  • Progress in recombinant DNA-derived vaccines for Lassa virus and filoviruses
  • Borna disease virus – Fact and fantasy
  • A review of Nipah and Hendra viruses with an historical aside
  • Negative-strand RNA viruses: The plant-infecting counterparts
  • Quasispecies as a matter of fact: Viruses and beyond

 

Measles virus fusion and entry

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

Measles virus The Paramyxoviridae are enveloped, non-segmented, negative-strand RNA viruses that include major human pathogens belonging to two subfamilies. The Pneumonvirinae subfamily includes respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and the metapneumoviruses, while the Paramyxovirinae subfamily includes, amongst others, measles virus (MeV), mumps virus, human parainfluenza viruses (hPIV1-4), and the recently emerged, highly pathogenic henipaviruses Hendra (HeV) and Nipah (NiV). Members of both subfamilies are responsible for significant human morbidity and mortality. MeV, in particular, remains a major cause of childhood mortality worldwide despite the availability of a live-attenuated vaccine.

All paramyxoviruses gain entry into and spread between cells by promoting direct membrane fusion. Membrane merger is mediated by the viral fusion (F) protein, which, like other class I fusion proteins such as influenza HA and HIV env, first forms metastable homo-trimers that require proteolytic activation to gain functionality. Receptor binding by the attachment protein is thought to then trigger major conformational changes in mature F, resulting first in insertion of a hydrophobic domain, the fusion peptide, into the target membrane and ultimately in formation of a fusion pore through juxtapositioning of the F transmembrane domain and fusion peptide in the thermodynamically stable postfusion conformation. Unlike retro- or orthomyxovirus entry, the complexity of the paramyxovirus fusion triggering mechanism is raised to a higher level by the fact that the receptor binding and fusion-promoting functions are contributed by separately encoded envelope glycoproteins. This physical separation of the two functions necessitates a mechanism of posttranslational linkage, which is accomplished through the formation of virus-specific hetero-oligomer complexes between the two proteins. However, the overall organization of functional Paramyxovirinae fusion complexes and the molecular mechanism that links receptor binding with coordinated F protein refolding into the postfusion conformation remain largely unknown.

 

Structural and Mechanistic Studies of Measles Virus Illuminate Paramyxovirus Entry. (2011) PLoS Pathog 7(6): e1002058. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002058
Measles virus (MeV), a member of the paramyxovirus family of enveloped RNA viruses and one of the most infectious viral pathogens identified, accounts for major pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide although coordinated efforts to achieve global measles control are in place. Target cell entry is mediated by two viral envelope glycoproteins, the attachment (H) and fusion (F) proteins, which form a complex that achieves merger of the envelope with target cell membranes. Despite continually expanding knowledge of the entry strategies employed by enveloped viruses, our molecular insight into the organization of functional paramyxovirus fusion complexes and the mechanisms by which the receptor binding by the attachment protein triggers the required conformational rearrangements of the fusion protein remain incomplete. Recently reported crystal structures of the MeV attachment protein in complex with its cellular receptors CD46 or SLAM and newly developed functional assays have now illuminated some of the fundamental principles that govern cell entry by this archetype member of the paramyxovirus family. Here, we review these advances in our molecular understanding of MeV entry in the context of diverse entry strategies employed by other members of the paramyxovirus family.

Human metapneumovirus in wild mountain gorillas

Monday, April 11th, 2011

Mountain gorilla The world’s remaining 786 mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) live in 2 parks in Rwanda, Uganda, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. An ecotourism industry for viewing human-habituated mountain gorillas in the wild is thriving in all 3 countries. Mountain gorilla tourism helps ensure the sustainability of the species by generating much-needed revenue and increasing global awareness of the precarious status of this species in the wild. Tourism, however, also poses a risk for disease transmission from humans to the gorillas.

Habitat encroachment and poaching are threats to wildlife survival, particularly in the developing world. Mountain gorillas face an additional threat from infectious diseases. Second only to trauma, infectious diseases, primarily respiratory, account for 20% of sudden deaths. The close genetic relatedness of mountain gorillas and humans has led to concerns about the potential interspecies transmission of infectious agents. Although most surveillance efforts focus on risk for humans, mountain gorillas are immunologically naive and susceptible to infection with human pathogens. The parks in which mountain gorillas live are surrounded by the densest human populations in continental Africa. In addition, research and gorilla ecotourism brings thousands of persons from the local communities and from around the world into direct and indirect contact with the gorillas. The frequency and closeness of contact is particularly pronounced in Virunga National Park, where 75% of mountain gorillas are habituated to the presence of humans.

To minimize the threat of disease transmission, the Rwandan, Ugandan, and Congolese governments restrict tourist numbers and proximity, and the Congolese wildlife authority mandates that masks be worn by persons visiting gorillas. Nonetheless, the frequency and severity of respiratory disease outbreaks among mountain gorillas in the Virunga Massif have recently increased. From May through August 2008, sequential respiratory outbreaks occurred in 4 groups of mountain gorillas accustomed to tourism in Rwanda. Between June 28 and August 6, 2009, a fifth outbreak occurred in 1 of these groups, Hirwa. This paper describes the Hirwa outbreak. Respiratory outbreaks were defined as more than one third of animals in a group exhibiting signs of respiratory disease (coughing, oculonasal discharge, and/or lethargy).

Human metapneumovirus infection in wild mountain gorillas, Rwanda. Emerg Infect Dis. Apr 2011 doi: 10.3201/eid1704.100883
The genetic relatedness of mountain gorillas and humans has led to concerns about interspecies transmission of infectious agents. Human-to-gorilla transmission may explain human metapneumovirus in two wild mountain gorillas that died during a respiratory disease outbreak in Rwanda in 2009. Surveillance is needed to ensure survival of these critically endangered animals.

Related:

Fabulous Measles Timeline

Sunday, April 3rd, 2011

From History of Vaccines:

Measles timeline

Molecular Epidemiology and Evolution of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Human Metapneumovirus

Friday, March 11th, 2011

RSV Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) are common respiratory pathogens. Both viruses comprise two genetic groups, A and B, distinguishable genetically and serologically which circulate with fluctuating frequencies. This gives rise to the observation of switching of the predominantly circulating subtype between seasons. Repeat HRSV infections occur throughout life with decreasing morbidity, and increasingly evidence suggests the same is also true for HMPV. In neither case has it yet been possible to make an effective vaccine against these troublesome pathogens.

Molecular Epidemiology and Evolution of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Human Metapneumovirus. (2011) PLoS ONE 6(3): e17427
Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) are ubiquitous respiratory pathogens of the Pneumovirinae subfamily of the Paramyxoviridae. Two major surface antigens are expressed by both viruses; the highly conserved fusion (F) protein, and the extremely diverse attachment (G) glycoprotein. Both viruses comprise two genetic groups, A and B. Circulation frequencies of the two genetic groups fluctuate for both viruses, giving rise to frequently observed switching of the predominantly circulating group. Nucleotide sequence data for the F and G gene regions of HRSV and HMPV variants from the UK, the Netherlands, Bangkok and data available from Genbank were used to identify clades of both viruses. Several contemporary circulating clades of HRSV and HMPV were identified by phylogenetic reconstructions. The molecular epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics of clades were modelled in parallel. Times of origin were determined and positively selected sites were identified. Sustained circulation of contemporary clades of both viruses for decades and their global dissemination demonstrated that switching of the predominant genetic group did not arise through the emergence of novel lineages each respiratory season, but through the fluctuating circulation frequencies of pre-existing lineages which undergo proliferative and eclipse phases. An abundance of sites were identified as positively selected within the G protein but not the F protein of both viruses. For HRSV, these were discordant with previously identified residues under selection, suggesting the virus can evade immune responses by generating diversity at multiple sites within linear epitopes. For both viruses, different sites were identified as positively selected between genetic groups.

Related: