Posts Tagged ‘xmrv’

XMRV – the fight continues

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

XMRV In October 2009 it was reported that 68 of 101 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in the USA were infected with a novel gamma retrovirus, xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus (XMRV), a virus previously linked to prostate cancer. This finding, if confirmed, would have a profound effect on the understanding and treatment of an incapacitating disease affecting millions worldwide.

But does XMRV cause disease? It’s far from clear that it does.

No Evidence of XMRV or Related Retroviruses in a London HIV-1-Positive Patient Cohort. 2011 PLoS ONE 6(3): e18096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018096
Background
Several studies have implicated a recently discovered gammaretrovirus, XMRV (Xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus), in chronic fatigue syndrome and prostate cancer, though whether as causative agent or opportunistic infection is unclear. It has also been suggested that the virus can be found circulating amongst the general population. The discovery has been controversial, with conflicting results from attempts to reproduce the original studies.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We extracted peripheral blood DNA from a cohort of 540 HIV-1-positive patients (approximately 20% of whom have never been on anti-retroviral treatment) and determined the presence of XMRV and related viruses using TaqMan PCR. While we were able to amplify as few as 5 copies of positive control DNA, we did not find any positive samples in the patient cohort.
Conclusions/Significance
In view of these negative findings in this highly susceptible group, we conclude that it is unlikely that XMRV or related viruses are circulating at a significant level, if at all, in HIV-1-positive patients in London or in the general population.

Human rumour viruses – a cautionary tale of virus and disease

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

XMRV The recent identification of retrovirus XMRV and a second retrovirus of a different subtype in chronic fatigue syndrome has aroused much interest, not least among sufferers. However, it remains highly controversial whether the detection of these viruses represents true infection or laboratory artifacts. In this paper, Professor Robin Weiss, the UK’s leading authority on retroviruses, gives his critical appraisal of this confusing data and concludes:

Many people suffering from CFS greeted the first report with enthusiasm and relief because of the persistent skepticism of physicians about whether CFS is a defined disease with a single cause. If the association of at least two kinds of murine-related retrovirus with the syndrome stands the test of time, it will represent a very important discovery. CSF patients would then be assured of having a recognized infection with the possibility of effective treatment – indeed, some of them are already so convinced they have started treatment with anti-retroviral drugs (first developed against HIV) in the hope of clearing infection and their symptoms. Blood banks would have to consider whether to screen donations for the implicated retroviruses. But before such steps could be justified, it will be essential to perform truly blinded tests on cases and proper controls in several laboratories. Profoundly disappointing as this would be for patients, without such additional studies, laboratory artifacts cannot be ruled out; also, with the signal exceptions of HIV and human T-lymphotrophic virus, the history of retroviral associations with human disease is not encouraging.

A cautionary tale of virus and disease. BMC Biology 2010, 8: 124 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-124

Related:

XMRV does not cause CFS in the UK

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

XMRV In October 2009 it was reported that 68 of 101 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in the USA were infected with a novel gamma retrovirus, xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus (XMRV), a virus previously linked to prostate cancer. This finding, if confirmed, would have a profound effect on the understanding and treatment of an incapacitating disease affecting millions worldwide. Researchers have now investigated CFS sufferers in the UK to determine if they are carriers of XMRV.

186 UK CFS patients were screened for XMRV provirus and for the closely related murine leukaemia virus. XMRV or MLV sequences were not amplified from DNA originating from CFS patients in the UK. The study found no evidence that XMRV is associated with CFS in the UK. This may be a result of population differences between North America and Europe regarding the general prevalence of XMRV infection, and might also explain the fact that two US groups found XMRV in prostate cancer tissue, while two European studies did not. Alternative explanations are also possible.

Failure to Detect the Novel Retrovirus XMRV in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8519. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008519

Related:

Prostate Cancer Caused By a Virus?

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

XMRV Prostate cancer is the most common form of nonskin cancer in U.S. men. The lifetime risk for developing prostate cancer is 1 in 6 in the United States, and globally, 3% of men die of prostate cancer. Morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer are likely to grow further, given increasing longevity. Epidemiologic studies indicate that infection and inflammation may play a role in the development of prostate cancer.

XMRV is present in malignant prostatic epithelium and is associated with prostate cancer, especially high-grade tumors. PNAS USA September 8 2009 doi:10.1073/pnas.0906922106
Xenotropic murine leukemia virus–related virus (XMRV) was recently discovered in human prostate cancers and is the first gammaretrovirus known to infect humans. While gammaretroviruses have well-characterized oncogenic effects in animals, they have not been shown to cause human cancers. We provide experimental evidence that XMRV is indeed a gammaretrovirus with protein composition and particle ultrastructure highly similar to Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV), another gammaretrovirus. We analyzed 334 consecutive prostate resection specimens, using a quantitative PCR assay and immunohistochemistry with an anti-XMRV specific antiserum. We found XMRV DNA in 6% and XMRV protein expression in 23% of prostate cancers. XMRV proteins were expressed primarily in malignant epithelial cells, suggesting that retroviral infection may be directly linked to tumorigenesis. XMRV infection was associated with prostate cancer, especially higher-grade cancers. We found XMRV infection to be independent of a common polymorphism in the RNASEL gene, unlike results previously reported. This finding increases the population at risk for XMRV infection from only those homozygous for the RNASEL variant to all individuals. Our observations provide evidence for an association of XMRV with malignant cells and with more aggressive tumors.

Related:

Viruses and Cancer: XMRV and Prostate Cancer

Monday, March 19th, 2007

Plymouth Rock ChickenWay back in 1908, two Danish vets called Vilhelm Ellerman and Oluf Bang who were searching for an infectious cause for leukaemia succeed in transferring the disease from one chicken to another using cell-free tissue filtrates (Ellerman C. Bang O. Centralbl.Bakteriol. 46: 595609). In 1909, fresh out of medical school and with only two years of research under his belt, Peyton Rous joined the Rockefeller Institute and was put in charge of the laboratory for cancer research. One year later Rous was able to transmit solid tumours of chickens by transplanting tissue, which he followed up by isolating the infectious agent responsible for the tumour, Rous Sarcoma Virus (Rous P. J.Exp.Med. 12:696705; Rous P. J.Exp.Med. 13:397411). Now, I like my Kentucky fried science as much as the next guy, but what really drove these early researchers was the idea that human cancers might be infectious. Once it was shown that some (but by no means all) animal tumours were caused by viruses, it seemed like it might be a short step to translating that discovery into human medicine. Although a wide range of oncogenic viruses were shown to cause cancers in animals, it wasn’t until 1981 and the discovery of human T-cell leukaemia virus (HTLV) that the first pathogenic human retrovirus was found.

Subscribe to podcasts (free):
[iTunes] Enhanced podcasts
[RSS] mp3 podcasts (audio only)
Download this podcast (free):
Enhanced version
mp3 version (audio only)

It is currently estimated that 20-25% of human cancers are caused by viruses, although, because of the complicated nature of carcinogenesis, other factors also contribute to tumour formation in many cases. Some viruses directly promote tumours through the actions of viral protein(s) which alter the growth properties of transformed cells. The E6 and E7 proteins of oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV) do this by binding to and inactivating cellular tumour suppressor proteins. That’s why it would be a good idea to prevent this by vaccinating against the most dangerous types of HPV. Other human tumour viruses cause cancer indirectly and the tumour cells themselves may not express the virus. Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses are believed to cause liver cancer by inducing chronic damage to hepatocytes; continual hepatocyte division to replace the damaged liver tissue may establish a cellular environment where other genetic changes result in cancer. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causes cancer indirectly by compromising the immune system and allowing cancers induced by Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus (HHV-8), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and other viruses to develop.

In the majority of human tumours, it is not possible to identify any virus involvement, but genetic studies of rare families with predispositions to certain cancers have led to the identification of tumour suppressor genes which negatively regulate cell replication or growth and whose functions are lost in tumour cells. The classic example of this is the Rb tumour suppressor gene which was identified by studies of individuals with familial retinoblastoma (Human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene: cloning, identification, and sequence. 1987 Science 235: 1394-1399).

Prostate cancer A less well known example is the familial susceptibility locus Hpc1 which is caused by mutations in the gene for RNase L (Germline mutations in the ribonuclease L gene in families showing linkage with HPC1. 2002 Nature Genetics 30: 181-184). RNase L helps mediate the interferon-induced innate antiviral response. In Hpc1 families, a single amino acid substitution in RNase L leads to reduced enzyme activity, and individuals with this common genotype (~11% of the population) have been reported to have a 2-fold elevated risk for development of prostate cancer. Because of the known role of RNase L in fighting virus infections, it was suggested that this defect in this enzyme might allow infection with an oncogenic virus, leading to prostate cancer. A research paper published at the end of last year showed that 40% of prostate cancers from patients with the defective RNase L gene showed evidence of infection with xenotropic endogenous murine leukaemia retrovirus (XMRV), whereas less than 2% of sporadic prostate cancers showed evidence of this virus (Identification of a Novel Gammaretrovirus in Prostate Tumors of Patients Homozygous for R462Q RNASEL Variant. 2006 PLoS Pathog 2, e25).

Although this was a tantalizing discovery, the initial results were based on PCR, which raised the possibility of laboratory contamination, and retrovirus was actually found in stromal and haematopoietic cells within the tumour rather than in the cancer cells themselves.
In January, a new paper provided crucial additional support for the original findings (An infectious retrovirus susceptible to an IFN antiviral pathway from human prostate tumours. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007 104: 1655-1660). The researchers assembled a complete XMRV genome from two cDNA clones and obtained infectious virus by transfecting human prostate cancer cell lines. They also showed that XMRV is sensitive to interferon, which is supports the fact that it is found in tumours from patients with defective RNase L genes. By cloning the junctions between XMRV DNA and human cellular DNA from two primary human prostate cancers, they confirmed XMRV infection of the tumour cells and ruled out the possibility that initial identification of the virus was a PCR artifact. At present it is not known whether XMRV integration affects gene expression directly or whether the integrations might have indirect effects on the aetiology or progression of prostate cancer.

Some big questions still remain. Is XMRV infection involved in nonfamilial cases of prostate cancer? What is the exact mechanism of tumourigenesis? What is the origin of XMRV- is it a zoonotic infection, transmitted from mice to humans? How widely distributed is XMRV infection in humans? Is XMRV associated with any other human cancers? And how many other human tumours involve infections by viruses?